• Users Online: 210
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
TECHNICAL NOTE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 40-46

Endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A technical note


1 Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Segyro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission21-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance28-Dec-2021
Date of Web Publication9-Mar-2022

Correspondence Address:
Kangtaek Lim
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Segyro Hospital, 248, Wiryeseo-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul
Korea
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joss.joss_37_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Laminectomy and fusion were surgical options to decompress neural structures and provide more space for the spinal cord in a stenosis patient with severe leg pain and progressive neurologic signs, such as numbness and weakness. The evolution of endoscopic spinal surgery techniques has created advantages for patients who require a laminectomy. The authors present a unique technique for endoscopic access to the central and lateral recess pathology as a minimally invasive procedure, which provides a good visualization. We performed two cases of endoscopic spinal surgery for single-level and consecutive three-level lumbar spinal canal stenosis using an 8 mm outer diameter, 5.5 mm working channel, 10° angled lens spinal endoscopic system (percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression, MaxMore Spine Company, Unterföhring, Germany). Optimized endoscopic drills, forceps, and Kerrison punch were used to remove bony pathology and ligamentum flavum under direct endoscopic visualization. The first case had a narrow canal space in the L4/L5 segment with severe numbness at the same dermatome and did not respond with adequate conventional treatment. The second case had three-level canal stenosis with severe back pain and leg weakness. The purpose of this paper is to describe the technique, the efficacy, and feasibility of unilateral endoscopic laminectomy and bilateral decompression via posterior approach in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Moreover, in this article, we present the technical details on endoscopic procedures and the prevention of complications and management during operation for spinal canal stenosis.

Keywords: Endoscopic spinal surgery, percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression, spinal stenosis


How to cite this article:
Lim K, Sardhara J. Endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A technical note. J Spinal Surg 2022;9:40-6

How to cite this URL:
Lim K, Sardhara J. Endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A technical note. J Spinal Surg [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 5];9:40-6. Available from: http://www.jossworld.org/text.asp?2022/9/1/40/339273




  Introduction Top


Spinal stenosis is the progressive deterioration of spinal discs, and facet joints due to wear and tear with aging can also produce narrowing of the spinal canal, causing pain, numbness, weakness in the legs.[1],[2] As the world is becoming an aging society, there is an increasing incidence of spinal stenosis in aged people.[3] Another problem for elderly patients can be associated with a progressive loss of functional reserve in all organ systems and can bring many medical issues. The physiologic changes in old age impact the anesthetic process, increasing susceptibility to anesthetic drugs, especially a long operation time of conventional open spine surgery.[4]

Conservative treatment should be the initial option of treatment for stenosis. Medications and physical therapy can be helpful to relieve symptoms before considering surgical treatment, but if there is no improvement with these conservative measures, surgical treatment should be considered.[5]

Microscopic laminectomy or fusion surgery was one of the most common operative procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis under general anesthesia.[6],[7] As spinal endoscopy developed, various surgical approaches were tried and introduced under local anesthesia, and spinal stenosis also became an indication of endoscopic surgery. This technical report will describe surgical techniques, decompress neural elements in the narrow interlaminar window using spinal endoscopy, and manage the complications in detail that may arise during operation for endoscopic beginners.

A large 5.5 mm working channel endoscope with an outer diameter of 8 mm was used in this report to perform a unilateral laminectomy, bilateral decompression in a narrow interlaminar window in lumbar canal stenosis.


  Case 1 Top


A 67-year-old woman presented with lower left leg pain (both L5 dermatomes) and neurogenic claudication for 2 years. Neurological examination revealed an apparent ankle weakness on the right side that was resistant to medical treatment and nerve root block. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a narrow spinal canal without foraminal stenosis at the L45 disc level [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. Computed tomography demonstrated a narrow interlaminar bone window and thickened ligament flavum [Figure 1]c.
Figure 1: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (a, b) and Computed tomography scan findings (c): A severe narrow spinal canal is found at the L4/5 level. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (d and e), Computed tomography scan (f) reveal bilateral decompression with minimum bone work

Click here to view



  Surgical Process Top


Ipsilateral decompression

The procedures were performed under epidural anesthesia without sedation. The patients were placed in the prone position on the radiolucent Wilson frame in a flexed position. The skin entry point was just beside the spinous process, a 7 mm scalpel was used to make a stab wound. The dilator was inserted down to the laminar surface via lateral fluoroscopic view to determine the landing point. A 8.5 mm working sleeve was inserted through this dilator to create space to introduce endoscopic systems. Endoscopy was placed over the surface of the lamina through the working sleeve [Figure 2]. A flexible radiofrequency (RF) was used for bleeding control, and a 4 mm diamond drill, a 45° angled 2 mm, 5 mm Kerrison punch were used for laminectomy and removal of ligament flavum. The landing point was on the lamina surface vertically, not interlaminar space, that was easy to process with laminectomy from the lower part of the upper lamina and is easier to reach ligament flavum from uppermost to lowermost with 45° angled Kerrison punch also. Once endoscopic systems land on the surface of the lamina vertically, tilted the endoscopy to interlaminar space, that way can keep the vector of power between 45° Kerrison punch and laminar angle from starting point to the endpoint well and is easy to remove ligament flavum all in a short operation time [Figure 3]a, [Figure 3]b, [Figure 3]c.
Figure 2: The endoscopic system's landing point is on the lamina's surface

Click here to view
Figure 3: Yellow dot line: (a) Landing point on the lamina; (b) Tilt endoscopy to interlaminar space to start laminectomy; (c) Tilt endoscopy to reach uppermost ligament flavum

Click here to view


During a laminectomy, preservation of facet joint is essential to prevent instability postoperatively. A MaxMore, 10° lens angle percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression (PSLD) endoscopy is easy to observe ipsilateral lateral recess can play an essential role for preserving bony structures include facet joint [Figure 4]. After sufficient laminectomy, the endoscopic system can reach the uppermost ligament flavum and start clearing away the ligament flavum from the top to the bottom using the Kerrison punch [Figure 5]a. Once the total ligament flavum was adequately removed, the drill was utilized to grind away the lateral recess and to decompressed the nerve root at the proximal foramen [Figure 5]b and [Figure 5]c. If discectomy is required, the root retractor is helpful to retract the nerve safely [Figure 5]d. An irrigation pump is used to maintain continuous water irrigation. As water pressure 40–60 mmHg, water permeates the epidural space, making more space between ligament flavum and dura.
Figure 4: Ipsilateral bone work using the diamond drill, 10° lens angle endoscopy is easy to see ipsilateral facet joint and can help to prevent facet violation

Click here to view
Figure 5: Ipsilateral decompression; (a) Kerrison punch is used to remove a ligament flavum from uppermost to the lowermost; (b) Lateral recess drilling; (c) Confirm full ipsilateral decompression; (d) Nerve retractor is useful for discectomy

Click here to view


Contralateral decompression

After tilting the endoscopic system to the opposite side, ventral subspinous and sublaminar drilling was performed to create a corridor for decompression of the central canal, the contralateral area [Figure 6]a. When the opposite ligament flavum is exposed, creating the interspace between dura and ligament flavum is essential to prevent damage to the neural structures [Figure 6]b. The surgeon should be careful not to damage the dura and contralateral nerve root caused by the Kerrison punch during removal of ligament flavum at midline and contralateral side. Sufficient contralateral decompression includes superior articular process resection and can provide the traversing root release like the ipsilateral side [Figure 6]c. After bleeding control at the bone and epidural vein, insertion of drain to prevent postoperative hematoma is the final procedure [Figure 6]d. Postoperative MRI revealed complete bilateral decompression, and the symptoms improved [Figure 1]d, [Figure 1]e, [Figure 1]f
Figure 6: Contralateral decompression; (a) Sub-spinous, Sub-laminar drilling to reach contralateral side; (b) Resection of contralateral ligament flavum; (c) confirmation of contralateral traversing root decompression; (d) The end-stage of bilateral decompression. A wide space is visible around the thecal sac

Click here to view



  Case 2 Top


A 66-year-old male presented with low back pain, bilateral leg numbness, and claudication that started 1 years ago. These symptoms were resistant to medical treatment. Neurological examination revealed weakness on the knee and ankle flexion on both the lower limb. Lumbar MRI revealed severe spinal canal narrowing at L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 segments with root redundancy. The patient is placed prone on the radiolucent operating table, slightly flexed by placing Wilson's frame under the epidural anesthesia. A 8 mm skin incision was made, just beside the spinous process in the middle segment at the level of L3/4. After introducing endoscopic systems, L3 unilateral laminectomy, bilateral flavectomy, and trimming of facet to decompress lateral recess increased L3/4 the spinal canal space. The next upper and lower level follows the same procedure using the Jumping technique.[8] In three-level consecutive canal stenosis, the jumping technique [Figure 7] helps decompress all three-level through a single skin port using the skin's elasticity. In this technique, after completing one level, the working sleeve was moved cranially or caudally to the next target, using skin retraction within the same skin incision under image guidance. A new fasciotomy was made at each segment to place endoscopic systems on the lamina. The same process as the unilateral endoscopic laminotomy with bilateral decompression was performed for the remaining lumbar stenosis. After the procedures, a suction drain was placed at each surgical segment to prevent postoperative hematoma [Figure 8]a and [Figure 8]b.
Figure 7: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging a, c, e, g, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging b, d, f, h. Jumping technique for 3level decompression. ⓛ: Skin incision was made at middle segment-first, ②: Jumping down with skin retraction for next segment L45 decompression, ③: Jumping up for final segment L23 decompression. Red circle and white arrow: Skin retraction up and down, white dash: Fasciotomy. The working sleeve was moved upper or lower segment through a single skin port using the skin's elasticity

Click here to view
Figure 8: (a) 3 suction drainage catheter in 1skin port, (b) 3 suction drainage catheters on X-ray

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Conventional decompressive laminectomy is performed worldwide as an effective surgical technique for spinal canal decompression in stenosis.[9] However, normal anatomical structures, paraspinal muscle, and facet joint damage are indispensable in conventional open surgery.[10],[11]

With the advent of endoscopic science and technology in the recent era, the sorting between microscopic and endoscopic operation in the field of spine surgery is disappearing. Finally, endoscopic spine surgery as a more minimally invasive technique is now being performed globally to treat all spine disorders, including fusion surgery with significant efficacy and safety.[12] The importance of endoscopy and its instrument is emerging as a major issue lately. Since spinal endoscopy aims to provide direct visualization, it dramatically increases the area and quality of visualization as an object lens gets close to the surgical site. Various endoscopic instruments industries are trying to cope with the demand for more functional advanced instruments that can yield safety and great efficiency [Figure 9]. One of the tricky task during endoscopic decompression can be ipsilateral decompression. The lamina slope angle, the hypertrophic facet joints, and narrow lamina in the stenosis patients are the factors that create surgical difficulties to access the ipsilateral area in the canal.[13]
Figure 9: (a) 8 mm diameter, 10° lens catheter in percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression endoscopic systems. (b) Posterior approach, the skin entry point is just beside spinous process, land on the lamina. (c) Ipsilateral decompression. (d) Bilateral decompression, the end stage of procedures. (e) Contralateral decompression

Click here to view


Endoscopic decompression with the narrower-angle lens (10°) makes it easy to see the ipsilateral anatomical structures and allows to work closer to the surgical site during the procedure than a wider-angle lens. This can avoid damage to the ipsilateral facet joints and thus maintain spinal stability. Large-caliber endoscopic systems make it challenging to land on the lamina and also increase the possibility of facet violation. With the 8 mm diameter endoscopic systems, it is easy to dock on the lamina of interest for ipsilateral decompression and tilt, and decompression on the contralateral side remains very feasible.

In the early part of a learning curve, complications can be high due to a narrow spinal canal and poor endoscopic anatomical orientation, i.e., the possibility of iatrogenic facet fracture and dura and root injury. One of the severe complications is dural tear that occurs when removing ligament flavum at the midline and contralateral area. One can take caution during the removal of ligamentum flavum. Before cutting the ligament flavum, it should be held and lifted with a Kerrison punch to access the underlying adhesion with the dura. The 10° view is beneficial for early detection of dura tear underneath the thick ligamentum flavum so further dura and subsequent arachnoid damage can be prevented [Figure 10]. In the case of dura or arachnoid membrane tear, often rootlet is prolapsed outside in epidural space [Figure 11]a. Closing the water output of the endoscopy system with the fingers will increase pressure in the epidural space, push the rootlet into the intradural space, and work repositioning the rootlet in the thecal sac. TachoSil fibrin sealant patch can seal the defect by pushing into intradural space under the endoscopic view. It promotes the rapid formation of a strong bond between the dura and patch by the active ingredient substances like fibrinogen and thrombin of the TachoSil patch [Figure 11]b.[14] Additional apply of TachoSil® patch enables the dura to stick more firmly to the opposite layer of the dura, helping to seal the dura and can prevent the CSF from leaking [Figure 11]c and [Figure 11]d.
Figure 10: 10° lens angled endoscopic systems help look at the epidural space between dura and ligament flavum

Click here to view
Figure 11: (a) Dura tear is revealed with a herniated nerve rootlet under the endoscopic view. (b) Push Tachosil® into the intradural space can rootlet rearrange. (c) The amount of Tachosil® to put depending on the torn length of the dura. (d) Pressing the contact surface of the dura using forceps will stick together and close the dura

Click here to view


To get a clear surgical visualization during endoscopic surgery, strict hemostasis from the epidural tissue and bone is essential. Continuous water irrigation provides constant hydrostatic pressure to the epidural venous plexus and small artery of cancellous bone, allowing bleeding control during surgical procedures. Irrigation water goes inside through the 2 mm tube of endoscopy, and water escapes outward through the 5 mm working channel. The amount of water used for 30 min is about 3000 cc with 40 mmgh pressure. Thus, the total input and output were balanced and avoided any abnormal fluid retention in the soft tissue and epidural space. If bleeding from the venous plexus still does not control with hydrostatic pressure, bipolar RF heat coagulation can be a useful way to stop the bleeding [Figure 12]a. Cancellous bone compression firmly by Kerrison punch is also the efficient alternative to control the bleeding [Figure 12]b.
Figure 12: (a): Bipolar radiofrequency heat coagulation to stop epidural bleeding. (b) Cancellous bone compression by Kerrison punch to stop bone bleeding percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression

Click here to view


One of the advantages of endoscopic spine surgery for stenosis could be excellent surgical visualization that helps to reduce the possible damage and promotes safe surgery. Less tissue damage renders quick recovery. The possibility of multiple level decompression through the same single skin port is one of the most crucial additional advantages. The horizons of endoscopic spine surgery are now expanding to the majority of the lumbar and cervical spine diseases and still evolving.[15]


  Conclusions Top


Single- to multiple-level lumbar canal stenosis can be decompressed safely and effectively by a posterior approach using PSLD, an optimized spinal endoscopic system. The narrow interlaminar window can be overcome with laminectomy using a high-speed drill and Kerrison punch. With the clean endoscopic view, this method also made further decompression of lateral recess easy and safe.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, Luccarell G, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:579-86.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rosen DS, O'Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Hrubes M, Huo D, Sandhu FA, et al. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: Outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older. Neurosurgery 2007;60:503-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jackson RP, McManus AC, Moore J. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Treatment options for an aging population. Mo Med 2012;109:466-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Rivera R, Antognini JF. Perioperative drug therapy in elderly patients. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1176-81.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Onel D, Sari H, Dönmez C. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Clinical/radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145 patients. Conservative treatment or surgical intervention? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:291-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Phan K, Teng I, Schultz K, Mobbs RJ. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by microscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression: A technical note. Orthop Surg 2017;9:241-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ghogawala Z, Barker FG 2nd, Benzel EC. Fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016;375:600-1.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lim KT, Nam HG, Kim SB, Kim HS, Park JS, Park CK. Therapeutic feasibility of full endoscopic decompression in one- to three-level lumbar canal stenosis via a single skin port using a new endoscopic system, percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression. Asian Spine J 2019;13:272-82.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: Updated cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2312-20.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, et al. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Khalsa SS, Kim HS, Singh R, Kashlan ON. Radiographic outcomes of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurg Focus 2019;46:E10.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Simpson AK, Lightsey HM, Xiong GX, Crawford AM, Minamide A, Schoenfeld AJ. Spinal endoscopy: Evidence, techniques, global trends, and future projections. Spine J 2022;22:64-74.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Yu X, Zhao J, Feng F, Han Y, Zhong G, Liu Z, et al. Inclination of the small laminar slope angle leads to lumbar spinal stenosis due to hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2021;29:23094990211012846.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Nam HG, Kim HS, Park JS, Lee DK, Park CK, Lim KT. Double-layer tachosil packing for management of incidental durotomy during percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression. World Neurosurg 2018;120:448-56.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lim KT. Full endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. In: Sardhara J, Mehrotra A, Das KK, Bhaishora K, Behari S, editors. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Gautam Budh Nagar (India): Salubris; 2019. p. 64-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Surgical Process
Case 2
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed910    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded53    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]